Further Discussion of AdapterView and Adapter Request Issue # 1944

by Dianne Hackborn » Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:17:08 GMT


Sponsored Links
 Dialog is a good point, but the lifecycle would need to be managed by the
dialog, not by ListView.  At the ListView level there just isn't enough
information to manage it correctly -- that is, the management that would be
added for Dialog would be fairly different that what we currently have for
Activity.






-- 
Dianne Hackborn
Android framework engineer
hack...@android.com

Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
provide private support.  All such questions should be posted on public
forums, where I and others can see and answer them.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Further Discussion of AdapterView and Adapter Request Issue # 1944

by Jonathan Herriott » Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:41:35 GMT


 When you say there isn't enough information, I'm assuming you mean
that the views don't know when they are being released from memory.
In that case, the two options would be to have views death-aware or to
have the Dialog manage its lifecycle.  I'm sure the choice really boil
down to performance/memory usage, and in that case, the Dialog
managing its lifecycle is probably the best option.  If you agree,
I'll file a new bug on the Dialog.




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~


Sponsored Links


Further Discussion of AdapterView and Adapter Request Issue # 1944

by Dianne Hackborn » Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:22:39 GMT


 eah I think this would belong in Dialog.

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jonathan Herriott <herri...@gmail.com>wrote:



--
Dianne Hackborn
Android framework engineer
hack...@android.com

Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public
forums, where I and others can see and answer them.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Other Threads

1. Procedure for adding new Android user/group ID's?

In porting Android to a new device, I've run into some use cases where
we've added support for some native OEM hal-specific services and
hardware resources which do not seem to fall within the scope of the
existing ID's defined in system/core/include/private/
android_filesystem_config.h. In order to execute these services at the
appropriate privilege level, and provide controlled access to certain
shared resources, I'd like to define a few new OEM specific user/group
ID's. Are there guidelines for OEM's to extend these ID's? Should they
be in a specific range (for example, can we allocate the 9000-9100
range for OEM's) and include an OEM prefix so they don't conflict with
any new ID's that may be added in future Android releases?

Thanks,
Joel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: 

2. Does Android Emulator have its own linux kernel?

Hi:

I know that the android emulator is based on the QEMU. I  have setup
the emulator on my linux PC. I want to know the process flow when the
application works on emulator:

1. application goes to its own linux kernel, then it goes to QEMU,
then it goes to host Linux kernel
or
2. application goes to QEMU, then it goes to host Linux kernel.
or
3. the QEMU have compiled together with the linux kernel. Then
application goes to linux kernel of QEMU, then it goes to host Linux
kernel.

Could you tell me which one is how the emulator works?
And if possible, could you introduce some document about how  the
emulator works inside?

BTW, I already read some documents:
http://developer.android.com/guide/developing/tools/emulator.html
"A quick look inside the Android emulator"

I appreciate your help and hope I have stated my question clearly.
Regards,
Bo Zhao

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
unsubscribe: android-kernel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: 

3. Some transactions are charged a 5% transaction fee instead of the usual 30%

4. Google : Request for thread moderation !

5. is upgrade to 1.5 safe???

6. ListView OnItemClickListener no callback

7. Audio record and ply the recorded audio..