Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Muthu Ramadoss » Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:18:56 GMT


Sponsored Links
  can understand the developers community sentiments on this. I can only
hope Google is able to come up with a public Android SDK release soon.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



--
take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

http://cookingcapsules.com - nourish your droid.
http://mobeegal.in - find stuff closer.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Muthu Ramadoss » Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:38:56 GMT


 JP,

No, I don't have any inside track. I was speaking from a fellow developer
perspective, that If there's no access to the latest public SDK it would be
demoralizing big time.







-- 
take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

 http://cookingcapsules.com  - nourish your droid.
 http://mobeegal.in  - find stuff closer.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~


Sponsored Links


Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Hong » Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:53:05 GMT


 In another news today, Symbian is open sourced.  With millions of existing
Symbian phones, one has to wonder whether Android is THE mobile platform or
one of the mobile platforms...

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Muthu Ramadoss » Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:33:51 GMT


  strongly hope Android phones can run on cheap dumb phones to expensive
smart phones. That's the only way to take global market share right now.

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



--
take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

http://cookingcapsules.com - nourish your droid.
http://mobeegal.in - find stuff closer.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Hong » Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:18:00 GMT


 The only thing that costs less is the free android OS, which counts (on
average) 20% of a phone's total cost.  Imagine free symbian OS coming out...
what's the advantage here?

The cheap phone will probably not arrive any time soon, what we will see
initially will be $499 phones similar to HTC kaiser or TyTN.  The hardware
cost will go down, but it will not be an overnight drop.

Personally I think a cheap android-based phone will be out close to end of
2009 when hardware is cheaper and os is more stable ;)

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Muthu Ramadoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Muthu Ramadoss » Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:08:01 GMT


 The key point here is free and open source. If the entry barrier for the
small OEM's are removed, the cost of the devices would automatically come
down. Expecting the already established players to lower the cost on their
own is not going to benefit the end users anytime soon.







-- 
take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

 http://cookingcapsules.com  - nourish your droid.
 http://mobeegal.in  - find stuff closer.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Wall Street Journal article today - are things going down the drain for independent developers?

by Shane Isbell » Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:00:50 GMT


 Lol, things are becoming clearer and now I'm starting to feel sorry for
Google. It's not easy dealing with shifting, vague, contradictory, all
high-priority requirements (except the really important ones) of
carriers. Also makes sense why Google is not releasing public SDKs and doing
snapshots, as the requirements aren't even clear. The top-50 are earning
their money now and many will be doing it for free. So sad.

Shane






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Other Threads

1. AudioTrack sanity test

Hi.
I am trying to determine if I should go the ndk way to work on a music
synth app, but first wanted to do a sanity check in the java layer by
testing how many sine tones i could play concurrently, and so I tried
this. And it's pretty low: I can only play about 4 or 5 tones before
the obtainBuffer timeouts start increasing in number. Also, changing
the media volume while the tones are playing disrupts the output.
These are the basic settings for each of the tones:
- fs = 11025
- AudioFormat.CHANNEL_CONFIGURATION_MONO
- AudioFormat.ENCODING_PCM_8BIT
- AudioTrack.MODE_STREAM
I would like to know how one can best avoid obtainbuffer timeout
errors.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

2. ActivityGroup and subactivities Lifetime.

Hi!,
   I'm extending ActivityGroup class and implemented a custom tabHost
and widgets for my app. Can someone shed a light on how are the
Activities fife-time inside an ActivityGroup?.

Im getting a weird behavior when using the following code to send a
new intent to the current sub-activity, then change tab, and getting
back to original tab. (TAB1 -> TAB2 -> TAB1)

LocalActivityManager lm = getLocalActivityManager();

Intent i = new Intent(this, lm.getCurrentActivity().getClass());
i.setAction(WeegohApp.INTENT_ACTION_FILTER_SHC);
i.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_SINGLE_TOP);

lm.startActivity(tabHost.getCurrentTabTag(), i);


What i see from debug..

onSaveInstanceState() is called on TAB1, then TAB2 is current
subActivity, but when going back to TAB1 onCreate() is called.

onCreate() is not called with the same test without using the
onNewIntent() described above.

Thanks in advance !
CH


-- 

3. AlertBuildeer Problem

4. QVGA854 AVD not displaying properly

5. Alternatives to using 'createScaledBitmap' when adding 3D

6. Why are iPhone apps prettier than Android apps?

7. how to delete application from emulator in android?..