Free vs. Paid Package Names

by Paul » Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:53:37 GMT

Sponsored Links
 I'm trying to manage how I would change my previously free application
into two different applications and I'm debating between the following

1.) Manually change the package name in Manifest and correct all of my
references to R when I build my free version.
2.) Simply build both versions with the same package name.  I'm hoping
that when someone bought the paid version that the database would stay
and just the program code would change.

I'm leaning towards option 2 right now since it's easier to maintain.
I'm internationalized so changing the package name on R isn't trivial
and Google generates the class with the final modifier.

Any advice is appreciated.

Free vs. Paid Package Names

by Marco Schmitz » Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:19:43 GMT

 have you ever heard about refactoring? thats what you are doing. and
eclipse will help you so much...



Sponsored Links

Free vs. Paid Package Names

by Peli » Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:24:53 GMT

 > 2.) Simply build both versions with the same package name.

I doubt that you can upload two applications (free and paid) with the
same package name to the Market. One of the two has to be different.



Other Threads

1. Google Map for Dubai

Dear All

I bought G1 mobile from UK and am traveling between Dubai and UK and I
would to use the google map in Dubai
the mobile is unlock already...

What i have to do?



2. How do I write file:// URLs to access the SD card

I have a hundred megs of HTML-based documentation I would like to
stick on an SD card.   What sort of file:// URL should I use?


3. Neighbor Cell ID

4. bypassing e-mail at startup

5. Updating a map intent

6. TableRow

7. Update UI