Framework: does Android support USB devices?

by Will » Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:00:55 GMT


Sponsored Links
 Does the Android framework support USB devices, like Phidgets? Can an
app take a stream of data from a phidget?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Framework: does Android support USB devices?

by Will » Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:02:24 GMT


 Clarification: Is there a way to connect a Phidget, via USB, to the
Android and have an application gather input data from the phidget in
real time? (I hope that's clearer).



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~


Sponsored Links


Framework: does Android support USB devices?

by Will » Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:59:34 GMT


 Sidenote: I've made no progress - any help would be fantastically
appreciated.




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Framework: does Android support USB devices?

by ECSOLWI » Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:06:20 GMT


 Which USB-profile(s) does your Phidget use?

ECSOLWI
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Framework: does Android support USB devices?

by Mike Lockwood » Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:12:43 GMT


 


I'm not sure what a Phidget is, but currently there are no Java APIs
for dealing with USB at the moment.  We only have built-in support for
USB mass storage and ADB.

If you can give us a better idea of what you are trying to do, we will
be able to consider it as a feature request.

Mike

-- 
Mike Lockwood
Google android team

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~



Other Threads

1. Unit Testing

Hi,

Is there any tutorial on the instrumentation test framework, videos
and stuff for 1.6? It would be nice if the tutorials make use of the
Android Eclipse plugin.

Cheers

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

2. Settings.Secure.HTTP_PROXY (and proxy behaviour in general)

Dear anyone,

1) I am wondering if someone can shed a light on this. As I understand
it, Settings.Secure.HTTP_PROXY cannot be modified unless the
application has been signed by the platform certificate; does this
mean that it is up to the phone manufacturer (in conjunction with the
carrier, i suppose?) to release code which could modify this setting?
(Even with WRITE_SECURE_SETTINGS permission, my application[*] is not
allowed to create or modify this setting.)

2) It is possible to modify this value on rooted phones by directly
accessing the "secure" table in the corresponding database. However,
when this value is changed, I have noticed the following oddness
(which to me sounds like a bug):

    i) When the phone is connected to the carrier's network (not
wifi), it appears that (all?) applications honour the HTTP_PROXY
setting (e.g. it appears gmail and various browsers work just fine
through ConnectBot)

   ii) However, when the phone is connected wirelessly (wifi), most,
if not all, applications will ignore the value of HTTP_PROXY. For my
tests, it appears that Dolphin Browser sends the first two requests
via the configured proxy, and then all subsequent requests go direct.

Does anyone have an answer to this? Can we expect this to change? Or
do we need to ask developers of HTTP based applications to change
their code?

Thanks for reading,

Tor

[*] http://www.bogus.net/~torh/android/SetProxy.apk /
http://www.bogus.net/~torh/android/SetProxy-Screenshot.png

-- 

3. How can I add a transparent & scalable marker on Google map?

4. Better Keyboard 4.3

5. Using OS 1.6 and Up , are we penalized on the market ?

6. Tanya: download APK langsung di handset

7. Galerry nexus